Partitionierende Repräsentation und Polarisierung: Wie ein übersehener Aspekt heutiger Demokratien politische Polarisierung erzeugt

Hanno Scholtz

Autor/innen

Hanno Scholtz Universität Zürich

Schlagworte:

Polarisierung, Politische Soziologie, Wahlen, Partitionierende Repräsentation, Individualisierung, Institutionen, Parteimitgliedschaft, Transportkosten, Ulrich Beck

Abstract

Zur politischen Polarisierung mit dem Extrembeispiel USA liefert das vorliegende Papier eine neue Erklärung: Sie entsteht dadurch, dass Institutionen Individuen zu Gruppen zuordnen, was für heutige individualisierten Gesellschaften nicht mehr angemessen ist. Um dieses Argument zu untermauern, werden Evidenz zu (1) Polarisierung und (2) Individualisierung in westlichen Gesellschaften gesichtet, (3) das Konzept der „partitionierenden Repräsentation" eingeführt, und (4) beschrieben, wie die Diskrepanz zwischen Individualisierung und partitionierender Repräsentation zur Polarisierung in Parteien führt. Abschnitt (5) fasst zusammen.

Literaturhinweise

Afonso, A., und Y. Papadopoulos. 2015. How the Populist Radical Right Transformed Swiss Welfare Politics: From Compromises to Polarization. Swiss Political Science Review 21:617–635.

Ares, M., R. Burgisser, und S. Häusermann. 2021. Attitudinal polarization towards the redistributive role of the state in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties 31:41–55.

Bandura, Albert. 1986. The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 4:359.

Beck, Ulrich. 1983. Jenseits von Stand und Klasse? In: Soziale Ungleichheiten. Soziale Welt, Sonderband 2. Hrsg. Reinhard Kreckel, 35–74. Göttingen.

Beck, Ulrich. [1986] 1992. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications.

Bornschier, S. 2015. The New Cultural Conflict, Polarization, and Representation in the Swiss Party System, 1975–2011. Swiss Political Science Review 21:680–701.

Brady, Henry E., Sidney Verba und Kay Lehman Schlozman. 1995: Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation. American Political Science Review 89:271–294.

Carson, J. L., M. H. Crespin, C. J. Finocchiaro und D. W. Rohde. 2007. Redistricting and party polarization in the US House of Representatives. American Politics Research 35:878–904.

D'Aspremont, Claude, J. Jaskold Gabszewicz und Jean-Francois Thisse. 1979. On Hotelling's “Stability in Competition“. Econometrica 47:1145–1150.

Dahl, Robert Alan. 1971. Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Dalton, Russell J. 2021. Modeling ideological polarization in democratic party systems. Electoral Studies 72:10.

Dalton, Russell J. 2008. The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization, its Measurement and its Consequences. Comparative Political Studies 41:899–920.

Dalton, Russell J. 2017. Party system polarization index for CSES modules 1–4 countries. https://cses.org/data-download/download-data-documentation/party-system-polarization-index-for-cses-modules-1-4/ (26.09.2022).

Deci, E. L., und R. M. Ryan. 2000. The “what“ and “why“ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11:227–268.

Dogan, Mattei. 1995. Erosion of class voting and of the religious vote in Western Europe. International Social Science Journal 47:525.

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.

Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson.

Garmann, S. 2020. Political efficacy and the persistence of turnout shocks. Economics & Politics 32:411–429.

Granik, S. 2005. A reconceptualisation of the antecedents of party activism: A multidisciplinary approach. Political Studies 53:598–620.

Granovetter, Mark. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78:1360–1380.

Hobolt, S. B., T. J. Leeper und J. Tilley. 2021. Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarization in the Wake of the Brexit Referendum. British Journal of Political Science 51:1476–1493.

Hoffmann, H., und F. Springer. 2019. The Individual-Level Determinants of German Party Membership. German Politics 28:242–261.

Hotelling, Harold. 1929. Stability in Competition. Economic Journal 34:41–57.

Iyengar, Shanto, und Kyu S. Hahn. 2009. Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use. Journal of Communication 59:19–39.

Johnston, R. J., und C. J. Pattie. 1992. Class Dealignment and the Regional Polarization of Voting Patterns in Great Britain, 1964–1987. Political Geography 11:73–86.

Klein, Markus 2006. Partizipation in politischen Parteien. Eine empirische Analyse des Mobilisierungspotenzials politischer Parteien sowie der Struktur innerparteilicher Partizipation in Deutschland. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 47:35–61.

Lee, J. K., J. Choi, C. Kim und Y. Kim. 2014. Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization. Journal of Communication 64:702–722.

Maddison, Angus. 2010. Statistics on World Population, GDP and Per Capita GDP, 1–2008 AD. https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/historicaldevelopment/maddison/releases/maddison-database-2010.

Mason, Lilliana. 2016. A cross-cutting calm. How social sorting drives affective polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly 80:351–377.

Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Losing Common Ground: Social Sorting and Polarization. Forum – A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics 16:47–66.

McCright, Aaron M., und Riley E. Dunlap. 2011. The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly 52:155–194.

Müller, Walter. 1997. Sozialstruktur und Wahlverhalten. Eine Widerrede gegen die Individualisierungsthese. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 49:747-760.

Müller, Walter, und Markus Klein. 2011. Die Klassenbasis in der Parteipräferenz des deutschen Wählers. Erosion oder Wandel? Politische Vierteljahresschrift 45:85–110.

Nyhan, B., J. Reifler, S. Richey und G. L. Freed. 2014. Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics 133:E835–E842.

Perrett, S. 2021. A divided kingdom? Variation in polarization, sorting, and dimensional alignment among the British public, 1986–2018. British Journal of Sociology 72:992–1014.

Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, Robert David. 2000. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon&Schuster.

Rabbia, H. H., und S. Brussino. 2012. Practice and belonging: the reasons of party affiliation in a sample of citizen of Cordoba, Argentina/Practice and Membership: Reasons for Partisan Affiliation in Cordoba, Argentina. Perfiles Latinoamericanos 20:91–116.

Rawlings, C. M. 2022. Becoming an Ideologue: Social Sorting and the Microfoundations of Polarization. Sociological Science 9:313–345.

Reiljan, A., und A. Ryan. 2021. Ideological Tripolarization, Partisan Tribalism and Institutional Trust: The Foundations of Affective Polarization in the Swedish Multiparty System. Scandinavian Political Studies 44:195–219.

Saeki, M. 2019. Anatomy of Party Sorting: Partisan Polarization of Voters and Party Switching. Politics & Policy 47:699–747.

Salamone, J. D., M. Correa, J. H. Yang, R. Rotolo und R. Presby. 2018. Dopamine, Effort-Based Choice, and Behavioral Economics: Basic and Translational Research. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 12:1–13.

Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Regieren in Europa: Effektiv und demokratisch? Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus.

Schnell, Rainer, und Ulrich Kohler, 1995. Empirische Untersuchung einer Individualisierungshypothese am Beispiel der Parteipräferenz 1953-1992. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 47:634–657.

Scholtz, Hanno. 2002. Effiziente politische Aggregation. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.

Scholtz, Hanno. 2016a. Two Steps to Modernity: What Crises, Terror, and Other Parallels Tell For Understanding the 20th and Shaping the 21st Century. Zürich: Civil democracy press.

Scholtz, Hanno. 2016b. Why are the 2010s so much like the 1930s? And what will follow? Institutions of individualized responsibility and information efficiency as predicted by an analytical theory of modernity. In: Proceedings of the ISA Forum's Common Sessions on 'The Futures We Want: Global Sociology and the Struggles for a Better World', Hrsg. Markus Schulz, 80–88. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Scholtz, Hanno. 2017. Can the internet improve politics. DOI: 10.13140/RG.13142.13142.25564.90249.

Scholtz, Hanno. 2018. Groups under roofs: A network model of Europe and Western Christianity, their history, problems, and prospects. DOI: 10.13140/RG.13142.13142.34703.84647/13141.

Scholtz, Hanno. 2019. Civil democracy: The small mind change civil society needs to save the climate – and much more. Zürich: Civil democracy press.

Scholtz, Hanno. 2023. Partitionierende Repräsentation und Polarisierung: Wie ein übersehener Aspekt heutiger Demokratien politische Polarisierung erzeugt. https://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24682.39363

Scholtz, Hanno, forthcoming: Reclaim Responsibility with Civil Democracy: How to Empower Ourselves to Save the Climate, Foster Democracy, and End Violence. Zürich: Civil Democracy Press.

Schulze, H., M. Mauk und J. Linde. 2020. How Populism and Polarization Affect Europe's Liberal Democracies. Politics and Governance 8:1–5.

Silva, B. C. 2018. Populist radical right parties and mass polarization in the Netherlands. European Political Science Review 10:219–244.

Sjoberg, F. M., J. Mellon und T. Peixoto. 2017. The Effect of Bureaucratic Responsiveness on Citizen Participation. Public Administration Review 77:340–351.

Skytte, R. 2021. Dimensions of Elite Partisan Polarization: Disentangling the Effects of Incivility and Issue Polarization. British Journal of Political Science 51:1457–1475.

Spier, T. 2019. Not Dead Yet? Explaining Party Member Activity in Germany. German Politics 28:282–303.

Stroud, N. J. 2010. Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure. Journal of Communication 60:556–576.

Taber, C. S., und M. Lodge. 2006. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50:755–769.

Trilling, D., M. Van Klingeren und Y. Tsfati. 2017. Selective Exposure, Political Polarization, and Possible Mediators: Evidence From the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 29:189–213.

Vegetti, F. 2019. The Political Nature of Ideological Polarization: The Case of Hungary. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681:78–96.

von Alemann, U., und T. Spier. 2008. Parteimitglieder nach dem „Ende der Mitgliederpartei“. Ein Überblick über die Forschungsergebnisse für Westeuropa seit 1990. Österreichische Zeitschrift Fur Politikwissenschaft 37:29-44.

Whitely, P. F., und P. Seyd. 1996. Rationality and party activism: Encompassing tests of alternative models of political participation. European Journal of Political Research 29:215–234.

Yarchi, M., C. Baden und N. Kligler-Vilenchik. 2021. Political Polarization on the Digital Sphere: A cross-platform, over-time Analysis of Interactional, Positional, and Affective Polarization on Social Media. Political Communication 38:98–139.

Zingher, J. N., und M. E. Flynn. 2018. From on High: The Effect of Elite Polarization on Mass Attitudes and Behaviors, 1972–2012. British Journal of Political Science 48:23–45.

Partitionierende Repräsentation und Polarisierung

Wie ein übersehener Aspekt heutiger Demokratien politische Polarisierung erzeugt

Autor/innen

Schlagworte:

Abstract

Literaturhinweise

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

Ausgabe

Rubrik

Lizenz

Sprache

Aktuelle Ausgabe