How refugees are interpreted in public debates in different countries

First results of a comparative project

  • Daniel Drewski Freie Universität Berlin
  • Jürgen Gerhards Freie Universität Berlin
Schlagworte: Refugees, political discourses, comparative analysis, Turkey, Chile


This paper presents work in progress from a comparative qualitative analysis of political discourses on the admission or rejection of refugees in different countries around the world. Despite being subject to the norms and principles of international law that require states to open their borders to refugees seeking safety from persecution and serious human rights violations, states differ significantly in terms of their refugee policies and their justifications for these policies. In our project, we compare political discourses on the admission of refugees in different countries. We also try to account for country differences by drawing on the notion of “discursive opportunity structures”. We illustrate how different discursive opportunity structures might have shaped the political discourses in two of our six country cases: The Turkish discourse on Syrian refugees and the Chilean discourse on Venezuelan migrants.


Abdelaaty, Lamis. 2021. Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Arkan, Zeynep and Müge Kınacıoğlu. 2016. Enabling “ambitious activism”: Davutoğlu’s vision of a new foreign policy identity for Turkey. Turkish Studies 17(3):381–405.

De Wilde, Pieter, Ruud Koopmans, Wolfgang Merkel, Oliver Strijbis and Michael Zürn (eds.). 2019. The Struggle Over Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Drewski, Daniel and Jürgen Gerhards. 2020. The Liberal Border Script and its Contestations: An Attempt of Definition and Systematization. SCRIPTS Working Paper No. 4. Berlin: Cluster of Excellence 2055 “Contestations of the Liberal Script – SCRIPTS”.

Erdogan, Recep Tayyip. 2015. Turkish Grand National Assembly 25th Term 2nd Legislative Year Opening Speech. (Accessed: 18 Feb. 2021)

Ferree, Myra Marx, William Gamson, Jürgen Gerhards and Dieter Rucht. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and The Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hammerstadt, Anne. 2014. The Securitization of Forced Migration. In The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies, eds. Elena Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, Gil Loescher, Katy Long and Nando Sigona, 265–277. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Huysmans, Jef. 2006. The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London/New York: Routledge.

Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE) – Departamento de Extranjería y Migración (DEM). 2020. Estimación de personas extranjeras residentes habituales en Chile al 31 de diciembre 2019. Santiago de Chile: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas.

Joppke, Christian. 2005. Exclusion in the Liberal State: The Case of Immigration and Citizenship Policy. European Journal of Social Theory 8(1):43–61.

Lipset, Seymour M. and Stein Rokkan (eds.). 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York/London: The Free Press.

McCammon, Holly. 2013: Discursive Opportunity Structure. In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, eds. David A. Snow, Donatella della Porta, Bert Klandermans and Doug McAdam. (Accessed: 23 November 2020).

Polat, Rabia Karakaya. 2017. Religious solidarity, historical mission and moral superiority: construction of external and internal ‘others’ in AKP’s discourses on Syrian refugees in Turkey. Critical Discourse Studies 15(5):500–516.

Piñera, Sebastián. 2018. Presidente Piñera anuncia Reforma Migratoria. (Accessed 18 Feb. 2021)

Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoglu. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

UNHCR. 2020. Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2019. Copenhagen: UNHCR Global Data Service.

Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer (eds.). 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London/ Thousand Oaks/ New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Ad-hoc: Public Discourses on the Admission of Refugees and Asylum Seekers – Similarities and Differences between Countries