“I didn’t learn much about the embryo, my job was to look after the baby” – On the Construction of the Unborn in Pregnancies for Third Parties
Zur Konstruktion des Ungeborenen in Schwangerschaften für Dritte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21241/Keywords:
Surrogacy, Qualitative Research, Pregnancy, Embryo, Egg DonationAbstract
The Text focuses on the experiences of surrogacy. It draws on biographical-narrative interviews with surrogates from the United Kingdom, where surrogacy can be practiced legally in a limited form. The analysis centers on the construction of the unborn, specifically, how surrogates themselves navigate a pregnancy carried for others and which ascriptions to the unborn can be traced across different stages of pregnancy. Four parts from a larger sample of interviews are interpreted with respect to this question. The findings indicate that ascriptions to the unborn begin as early as the surrogate’s perspective on their own eggs. Furthermore, the interplay between genetic relatedness and pregnancy emerges as a relevant dimension for the interviewed surrogates. Both aspects are linked to forms of prenatal interaction. Surrogates must not only clarify their own sense of relational belonging to the child but also communicate their embodied experiences to the intended parents. Taken together, this tracing of perspectives raises additional questions that require further investigation if pregnancies carried for others are to be fully understood in their social, embodied, and relational dimensions.
References
Bandelli, Daniela. 2021. Sociological Debates on Gestational Surrogacy. Between Legitimation and International Abolition. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.
Banerjee, Swapnendu. 2013. Gestational Surrogacy Contracts: Altruistic or Commercial? A Contract Theoretical Approach. The Manchester School 81:438–460.
Bohnsack, Ralf, Iris Nentwig-Gesemann und Arnd-Michael Nohl. 2013. Einleitung: Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. In: Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung, Hrsg. Ralf Bohnsack, Iris Nentwig-Gesemann und Arnd-Michael Nohl, 9–32. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bujard, Martin, und Petra Thorn. 2018. Leihmutterschaft und Eizellspende. Der Gynäkologe 51:639–646.
Depenbusch, Marion, und Askan Schultze-Mosgau. 2020. Leihmutterschaft. In: Reproduktionsmedizin, Hrsg. Klaus Diedrich, Michael Ludwig und Georg Griesinger, 297–301. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Golombok, Susan, Catherine Jones, Poppy Hall, Sarah Foley, Susan Imrie und Vasanti Jadva. 2023. A longitudinal study of families formed through third-party assisted reproduction: Mother-child relationships and child adjustment from infancy to adulthood. Developmental Psychology 59:1059–1073.
Hirschauer, Stefan. 2015. Schwanger! Eine biographische und theoretische Krise. Beitrag zum Plenum 6 „Akteure (in) der Krise“. In: Routinen der Krise – Krise der Routinen. Verhandlungen des 37. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Trier 2014, Hrsg. Stephan Lessenich.
Hirschauer, Stefan, Birgit Heimerl, Anika Hoffmann und Peter Hofmann. 2014. Soziologie der Schwangerschaft. Explorationen pränataler Sozialität. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
Horsey, Kirsty. 2023. The future of surrogacy: a review of current global trends and national landscapes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 48.
Horsey, Kirsty. 2025. How UK Surrogates Navigate Arrangements, Processes and the Law. In: Future Directions in Surrogacy Law. Law and Policy Reform in the UK and Beyond, Hrsg. Kirsty Horsey, Zaina Mahmoud und Katherine Wade, 51–77. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Horsey, Kirsty, Zaina Mahmoud und Katherine Wade, Hrsg. 2025. Future Directions in Surrogacy Law. Law and Policy Reform in the UK and Beyond. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Keyes, Mary. 2024. Surrogacy in the Anglo world: the UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. In: Research Handbook on Surrogacy and the Law, Hrsg. Katarina Trimmings, Sharon Shakargy und Claire Achmad, 376–394. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Kom-rSF. 2024. Bericht der Kommission zur reproduktiven Selbstbestimmung und Fortpflanzungsmedizin. https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/presse/pressemitteilungen/kommissionsbericht-reproduktive-selbstbestimmung-pm-15-04-24.html (Zugegriffen: 8. Mai 2025).
Kuhnt, Anne-Kristin, und Jasmin Passet-Wittig. 2022. Familie und Reproduktionsmedizin. In: Handbuch Familiensoziologie, Hrsg. Oliver Arránz Becker, Karsten Hank und Anja Steinbach, 1–29. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Law Commission. 2023. Surrogacy – Law Commission. https://lawcom.gov.uk/project/surrogacy/ (Zugegriffen: 20. November 2023).
Mannheim, Karl, Hrsg. 1980. Strukturen des Denkens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Pfaller, Larissa. 2021. Die dunkle Seite der Vorstellungskraft: Das Abjekt als Verworfenes im Imaginären. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 46:301–319.
Schütze, Fritz. 1976. Zur Hervorlockung und Analyse von Erzählungen thematisch relevanter Geschichten im Rahmen soziologischer Feldforschung: dargestellt an einem Projekt zur Erforschung von kommunalen Machtstrukturen. In: Kommunikative Sozialforschung: Alltagswissen und Alltagshandeln, Gemeindemachtforschung, Polizei, politische Erwachsenenbildung, Hrsg. Ansgar Weymann, 159–260. München: Fink.
Stoeckle, Anabel. 2018. Rethinking Reproductive Labor through Surrogates’ Invisible Bodily Care Work. Critical Sociology 44:1103–1116.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Transitions. Proceedings of the 42nd Congress of the German Sociological Association in Duisburg 2025

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Contributions in the proceedings of the 42nd Congress of the German Sociological Association in Duisburg are published under the Creative Commons license “Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)”.
Third parties may:
- Share: reproduce and redistribute the contributions in any format or medium
- Edit: remix, modify, and build upon
them under the following conditions:
- Attribution: Third parties must provide appropriate copyright and rights information, include a link to the license, and indicate whether changes have been made.
- Non-commercial: Third parties may not use the material for commercial purposes.