Beyond Life and Death

Investigating Cryopreservation Practices in Contemporary Societies

  • Thomas Lemke
Schlagworte: Kryotechnologie, Forschung, Projekt


Der Beitrag stellt Ausgangsüberlegungen des Projekts CRYOSOCIETIES vor, das vom Europäischen Forschungsrat gefördert wird. Das Projekt untersucht die soziomateriellen Dimensionen der Sammlung, Lagerung und Nutzung von menschlichem und nicht-menschlichem organischen Material durch Verfahren des (Tief-)Kühlens und Gefrierens – die sogenannten Kryotechnologien. Es geht von der Annahme aus, dass kryobiologische Praktiken eine spezifische Form des Lebens hervorbringen: »suspendiertes Leben« (»suspended life«). Dessen Eigenart besteht darin – so die These des Projekts –, dass es vitale Prozesse in einem Schwebezustand zwischen Leben und Tod hält und konventionelle Zeit- und Raumkonzepte rekonfiguriert.
Im Mittelpunkt des Beitrags steht die Vorstellung der drei empirischen Teilprojekte, die untersuchen, wie »suspendiertes Leben« in aktuellen Praktiken der Kryokonservierung hervorgebracht wird. Bei der ersten Fallstudie geht es um das Feld der regenerativen Medizin und das Einfrieren von Nabelschnurblut, die zweite fokussiert auf individuelle Reproduktionsentscheidungen bzw. das zeitliche Hinausschieben der Realisierung des Kinderwunsches durch das Einfrieren von Eizellen; die dritte Fallstudie beschäftigt sich mit der Einrichtung sogenannter »Frozen Zoos« zum Erhalt bedrohter Tierarten. Das Fazit am Schluss stellt noch einmal die zentralen Merkmale und die Herausforderungen des aktuellen Forschungsvorhabens dar.

Cryopreservation practices are an essential dimension of contemporary life sciences. They make possible the freezing and storage of cells, tissues and other organic materials at very low temperatures and the subsequent thawing of these at a future date without apparent loss of vitality. The article presents some initial ideas and central theses of a research project recently funded by the European Research Council (ERC). The CRYOSOCIETIES project is based on the thesis that in contemporary societies, cryopreservation practices bring into existence a new form of life: »suspended life«. »Suspended life« enables vital processes to be kept in a liminal state in which biological substances are neither fully alive nor dead. CRYOSOCIETIES examines the creation of »suspended life« through three ethnographic studies that investigate various sites of cryopreservation. The first deals with cord blood banking with the promise to store vitality and ensure health; the second addresses oocyte freezing to extend fertility and rearrange reproductive futures, while the third case study focuses on the emergence of »frozen zoos«, that is to say cryobanks which seek to preserve organic material of endangered or extinct animal species. The conclusion highlights the central aspects of the proposed project and points to further directions of research.


Adams, V., Murphy, M., Clarke, A.E. 2009: Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity – International Journal of Critical Psychology, vol. 28, no. 1, 246–265.

Anderson, W. 2017: The Frozen Archive, or Defrosting Derrida. In J. Radin, E. Kowal (eds.), Cryopolitics. Frozen Life in a Melting World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 245–256.

Appleby-Arnold, S. 2013: Cord Blood Socialities. Between Biological Citizenship and Gift Economy. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.

Argyle, C.E., Harper, J.C., Davies, M.C. 2016: Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now? Human Reproduction Update, vol. 22, no. 4, 440–449.

Baldwin, K. 2017: ›I Suppose I Think to Myself, That’s the Best Way to Be a Mother‹: How Ideologies of Parenthood Shape Women’s Use of Social Egg Freezing Technology. Sociological Research Online, vol. 22, no. 2, 1–15.

Ballen, K.K., Gluckman, E., Broxmeyer, H.E. 2013: Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation: The First 25 Years and Beyond. Blood, vol. 122, no. 4, 491–498.

Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., van Lente, H. 2006: The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, vol. 18, no. 3-4, 285–298.

Bowker, G.C. 2005: Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Braun, B., Whatmore, S.J. 2010: Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy and Public Life. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.

Bravo, M. 2017: A Cryopolitics to Reclaim Our Frozen Material States. In J. Radin, E. Kowal (eds.), Cryopolitics. Frozen Life in a Melting World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 27–58.

Bravo, M., Rees, G. 2006: Cryo-politics: Environmental Security and the Future of Arctic Navigation. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, vol. 13, no. 1, 205–215.

Brown, N. 2003: Hope against hype – accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science & Technology Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, 3–21.

Brown, N. 2013: Contradictions of value: between use and exchange in cord blood bioeconomy. Sociology of Health & Illness, vol. 35, no. 1, 97–112.

Brown, N., Kraft, A. 2006: Blood ties: banking the stem cell promise. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 18, no. 3-4, 313–327.

Brown, N., Michael, M. 2003: A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 15, no. 1, 3–18.

Campbell, T., Sitze, A. (eds.) 2013: Biopolitics. A Reader. Durham, London: Duke University Press.

Chrulew, M. 2011: Managing Love and Death at the Zoo: The Biopolitics of Endangered Species Preservation. Australian Humanities Review, vol. 50, 137–157.

Clarke, A.G. 2009: The Frozen Ark Project: the role of zoos and aquariums in preserving the genetic material of threatened animals. International Zoo Yearbook, vol. 43, no. 1, 222–230.

Clarke, A.E, Fujimura, J.J. (eds.) 1992: The Right Tools For The Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Comizzoli, P. 2017: Biobanking and fertility preservation for rare and endangered species. Animal Reproduction, vol. 14, no. 1, 30–33.

Cooper, M. 2008: Life as Surplus. Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle, London: University of Washington Press.

Corley-Smith, G.E, Brandhorst, B.P. 1999: Preservation of endangered species and populations: A role for genome banking, somatic cell cloning, and androgenesis? Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 53, no. 3, 363–367.

de Chadarevian, S., Kamminga, H. (eds.) 1998: Molecularizing Biology and Medicine. New Practices and Alliances, 1910s–1970s. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

Dickenson, D. 2007: Property in the Body. Feminist Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Fletcher, A.L. 2014: Mendel’s Ark. Biotechnology and the Future of Extinction. New York: Springer.

Folkers, A., Lemke, T. (Hg.) 2014: Biopolitik. Ein Reader. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Fortun, M. 2008: Promising genomics. Iceland and deCODE Genetics in a world of speculation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Foucault, M. 1978: The History of Sexuality, vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. 2003: Society must be defended. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76. New York: Picador.

Franklin, S. 2007: Dolly Mixtures. The Remaking of Genealogy. Duke University Press.

Franklin, S., Lock, M. (eds.) 2003: Remaking Life and Death. Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

Friedrich, A. 2017: The Rise of Cryopower: Biopolitics in the Age of Cryogenic Life. In J. Radin, E. Kowal (eds.), Cryopolitics. Frozen Life in a Melting World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 59–70.

Friedrich, A., Höhne, S. 2014: Frischeregime: Biopolitik im Zeitalter der kryogenen Kultur. Glocalism – Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation, no. 1-2, 1–44.

Friese, C. 2009: Models of Cloning, Models for the Zoo: Rethinking the Sociological Significance of Cloned Animals. BioSocieties, vol. 4, no. 4, 367–390.

Friese, C. 2013: Cloning Wildlife. Zoos, Captivity, and the Future of Endangered Animals. New York: New York University Press.

Gook, D.A. 2011: History of oocyte cryopreservation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 23, no. 3, 281–289.

Hacking, I. 2002: Körperteile, groß und klein. In T. Steiner (Hg.), Genpool. Biopolitik und Körperutopien. Wien: Passagen, 18–48.

Hauskeller, C., Beltrame, L. 2016: The hybrid bioeconomy of umbilical cord blood banking: Re-examining the narrative of opposition between public and private services. BioSocieties, vol. 11, no. 4, 425–434.

Haverluk, T.W. 2007: The Age of Cryopolitics. FOCUS on Geography, vol. 50, no. 3, 1–6.

Haw, J. 2016: Corporeal Commodification and Women’s Work: Feminist Analysis of Private Umbilical Cord Blood Banking. Body & Society, vol. 22, no. 3, 31–53.

Hayden, C.P. 2003: Suspended Animation: A Brine Shrimp Essay. In S. Franklin, M. Lock (eds.), Remaking Life and Death. Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 193–226.

Helmreich, S. 2011: What was Life? Answers from Three Limit Biologies. Critical Inquiry, vol. 37, no. 4, 671–696.

Helmreich, S., Roosth, S. 2010: Life Forms: a Keyword Entry. Representations, vol. 112, no. 1, 27–53.

Hodes-Wertz, B., Druckenmiller, S., Smith, M., Noyes, N. 2013: What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? Fertility & Sterility, vol. 100, no. 5, 1343–1349.

Hoeyer, K. 2017: Suspense: Reflections on the Cryopolitics of the Body. In J. Radin, E. Kowal (eds.), Cryopolitics. Frozen Life in a Melting World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 205–214.

Katz, G., Mills, A. 2010: Cord blood banking in France: Reorganising the national network. Transfusion and Apheresis Science, vol. 42, no. 3, 307–316.

Kay, L.E. 1993: The Molecular Vision of Life. Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kowal, E., Radin, J. 2015: Indigenous biospecimen collections and the cryopolitics of frozen life. Journal of Sociology, vol. 51, no. 1, 63–80.

Kroløkke, C. 2014: Eggs and euros: A feminist perspective on reproductive travel from Denmark to Spain. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, vol. 7, no. 2, 144–163.

Lallemant, C., Vassard, D., Andersen, A.N., Schmidt, L., Macklon, N. 2016: Medical and social egg freezing: internet-based survey of knowledge and attitudes among women in Denmark and the UK. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 95, no. 12, 1402–1410.

Landecker, H. 2007: Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lanza, R.P., Dresser, B.L., Damiani, P. 2000: Cloning Noah’s Ark: Biotechnology might offer the best way to keep some endangered species from disappearing from the planet. Scientific American, vol. 283, 84–89.

Le Conte, J. 1901: What is Life? Science, New Series, vol. 13, 991–992.

Lemke, T. 2011: Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. New York, London: New York University Press.

Lemke, T. 2012: Second Nature: In the Age of Biobanks. In E. Pertz, P. North (eds.), The Yearbook of Comparative Literature. Protocols for a New Nature, vol. 58. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 188–195.

Lock, M. 2003: On Making Up the Good-as-Dead in a Utilitarian World. In S. Franklin, M. Lock (eds.), Remaking Life and Death: Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 165–192.

Martin, L.J. 2010: Anticipating Infertility: Egg Freezing, Genetic Preservation, and Risk. Gender & Society, vol. 24, no. 4, 526–545.

Martin, P., Brown, N., Turner, A. 2008: Capitalizing hope: the commercial development of umbilical cord blood stem cell banking. New Genetics and Society, vol. 27, no. 2, 127–143.

Moore, L.J. 2007: Sperm counts. Overcome by man’s most precious fluid. New York: New York University Press.

O’Connor, M.R. 2015: Resurrection Science. Conservation, De-Extinction and the Precarious Future of Wild Things. Melbourne: Affirm Press.

Parry, B. 2004: Technologies of immortality: the brain on ice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 35, no. 2, 391–413.

Pritchard, N. et al. 2017: Characteristics and circumstances of women in Australia who cryopreserved their oocytes for non-medical indications. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, vol. 35, no. 2, 108–118.

Radin, J. 2013: Latent life: concepts and practices of human tissue preservation in the international biological program. Social Studies of Science, vol. 43, no. 4, 484–508.

Radin, J. 2017: Life on Ice. A history of new uses for cold blood. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

Radin, J., Kowal, E. (eds.) 2017: Cryopolitics. Frozen Life in a Melting World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rose, N. 2007: The Politics of Life Itself. Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Samuel, G.N., Kerridge, I.H., O’Brien, T.A. 2008: Umbilical cord blood banking: public good or private benefit? Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 188, no. 9, 533–535.

Santoro, P. 2009: From (public?) waste to (private?) value. The regulation of private cord blood banking in Spain. Science Studies, vol. 22, no. 1, 3–23.

Saragusty, J. et al. 2016: Rewinding the Process of Mammalian Extinction. Zoo Biology, vol. 35, no. 4, 280–292.

Scheper-Hughes, N. 2000: The global traffic in human organs. Current Anthropology, vol. 41, no. 2, 191–224.

Shapiro, B. 2015: How to Clone a Mammoth. The Science of De-Extinction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sharp, L.A. 2006: Strange Harvest. Organ Transplants, Denatured Bodies, and the Transformed Self. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Shkedi-Rafid, A., Hashiloni-Dolev, Y. 2011: Egg freezing for age-related fertility decline: preventive medicine or a further medicalization of reproduction? Analyzing the new Israeli policy. Fertility & Sterility, vol. 96, no. 2, 291–294.

Sleeboom-Faulkener, M., Chang, H.-C. 2016: The private, the public and the hybrid in umbilical cord blood banking – a global perspective. New Genetics and Society, vol. 35, no. 3, 223–227.

Squier, S.M. 2004: Liminal Lives. Imagining the human at the frontiers of biomedicine. Durham: Duke University Press.

Stoler, A.L. 2009: Along the archival grain. Epistemic anxieties and colonial common sense. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sunder Rajan, K. 2006: Biocapital. The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, London: Duke University Press.

Svendsen, M.N. 2011: Articulating potentially: notes on the delineation of the blank figure in human embryonic stem cell research. Cultural Anthropology, vol. 26, no. 3, 414–437.

Swanson, K.W. 2014: Banking on the body. The market in blood, milk, and sperm in modern America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Taussig, K.-S., Hoeyer, K., Helmreich, S. 2013: The Anthropology of Potentiality in Biomedicine. An Introduction to Supplement 7. Current Anthropology, vol. 54, no. S7, S3–S14.

The ESHRE Working Group on Oocyte Cryopreservation in Europe 2017: Oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in European countries: statutory background, practice, storage and use. Human Reproduction Open, no. 1, 1–9.

Thompson, C. 2005: Making Parents. The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tutton, R. 2011: Promising pessimism: Reading the futures to be avoided in biotech. Social Studies of Science, vol. 41, no. 3, 411–429.

Tutton, R. 2017: Wicked futures: meaning, matter and the sociology of the future. The Sociological Review, vol. 65, no. 3, 478–492.

van de Wiel, L. 2015: Frozen in anticipation: Eggs for later. Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 53, 119–128.

Waldby, C. 2015: ›Banking time‹: egg freezing and the negotiation of future fertility. Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 17, no. 4, 470–482.

Waldby, C., Mitchell R. 2006: Tissue Economies. Blood, Organs and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Wittgenstein, L. 1953: Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.