Long-Term Unemployment Risks in Europe
Keywords:
European labour markets, long-term unemployment, labour market segmentation, labour market dualisation, economic crisisAbstract
This article discusses the changing social distribution of unemployment and long-term unemployment risks during the current financial and economic crisis. These risks are interpreted as the result of three different, overlapping forms of labour market segmentation: firstly, the institutionally stabilised polarisation between labour market insiders and outsiders; secondly, the occupational dualisation of high and low-skilled employees and occupations; and thirdly, the marginalisation of disadvantaged social groups. On the basis of EU-SILC data for 2012, it can be shown that long-term unemployment risks are especially high for low-skilled persons and occupations, single parents, migrants, and ill persons. This can be interpreted as an indicator for the occupational and social dualisation of labour markets espeically in the current crisis.References
Bentolila, S., Cahuc, P., Dolado, J. J., and Le Barbanchon, T. 2012: Two‐Tier Labour Markets in the Great Recession: France Versus Spain. The Economic Journal, 122(562), F155–F187.
Blanchard, O. J. 2006: European Unemployment: The Evolution of Facts and Ideas. Economic Policy 21 (45): 5–59.
Boeri, T. 2011: Institutional reforms and dualism in European labor markets. In O. Ashenfelter, D. Card (eds): Handbook of Labor Economics, volume 4b. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1173–1236.
Boeri, T., Garibaldi, P. 2009: Beyond eurosclerosis. Economic Policy 24(59): 409–461.
Doeringer, P. B., Piore, M. J. 1971: Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B., Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (eds) 2012: The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hox, J. J. 2010: Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications. Hove: Routledge.
ILO 2012: International Standard Classification of Occupations. Structure, group definitions and correspondence tables. ISCO–08 Volume I. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
Kalleberg, A. L. 2009: Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition. American Sociological Review 74 (1): 1–22.
Kalleberg, A. L., Sørensen, A. B. 1979: The Sociology of Labour Markets. Annual Review of Sociology 5: 351–379.
Kohn, M. E. 1987: Cross-National Research as an Analytic Strategy. American Sociological Review 52 (6): 713–731.
Lindbeck, A. 2001: Unemployment: Structural. International Encyclopaedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier: 15952–15958.
Lindbeck, A., Snower, D. J. 1988: The Insider-Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.
Mood, C. 2010: Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review 26 (1): 67–82.
Nickell, S. 1997: Unemployment and Labor Market Rigidities: Europe versus North America. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(3): 55–74.
Reich, M., Gordon, D. M., Edwards, R. C. 1973: A theory of labor market segmentation. The American Eco-nomic Review 63(2): 359–365.
Schwander, H., Häusermann, S. 2013: Who is in and who is out? A risk-based conceptualization of insiders and outsiders. Journal of European Social Policy 23(3): 248–269.
Siebert, H. 1997: Labor market rigidities: at the root of unemployment in Europe. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(3): 37–54.
Blanchard, O. J. 2006: European Unemployment: The Evolution of Facts and Ideas. Economic Policy 21 (45): 5–59.
Boeri, T. 2011: Institutional reforms and dualism in European labor markets. In O. Ashenfelter, D. Card (eds): Handbook of Labor Economics, volume 4b. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1173–1236.
Boeri, T., Garibaldi, P. 2009: Beyond eurosclerosis. Economic Policy 24(59): 409–461.
Doeringer, P. B., Piore, M. J. 1971: Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B., Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (eds) 2012: The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hox, J. J. 2010: Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications. Hove: Routledge.
ILO 2012: International Standard Classification of Occupations. Structure, group definitions and correspondence tables. ISCO–08 Volume I. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
Kalleberg, A. L. 2009: Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition. American Sociological Review 74 (1): 1–22.
Kalleberg, A. L., Sørensen, A. B. 1979: The Sociology of Labour Markets. Annual Review of Sociology 5: 351–379.
Kohn, M. E. 1987: Cross-National Research as an Analytic Strategy. American Sociological Review 52 (6): 713–731.
Lindbeck, A. 2001: Unemployment: Structural. International Encyclopaedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier: 15952–15958.
Lindbeck, A., Snower, D. J. 1988: The Insider-Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.
Mood, C. 2010: Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review 26 (1): 67–82.
Nickell, S. 1997: Unemployment and Labor Market Rigidities: Europe versus North America. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(3): 55–74.
Reich, M., Gordon, D. M., Edwards, R. C. 1973: A theory of labor market segmentation. The American Eco-nomic Review 63(2): 359–365.
Schwander, H., Häusermann, S. 2013: Who is in and who is out? A risk-based conceptualization of insiders and outsiders. Journal of European Social Policy 23(3): 248–269.
Siebert, H. 1997: Labor market rigidities: at the root of unemployment in Europe. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(3): 37–54.
Downloads
Published
2016-05-16
Issue
Section
Sektion Soz. Ungleichheit u. Sozialstrukturanalyse: Soziale Ungleichheiten in Zeiten der Krise
License
Beiträge im Verhandlungsband des 37. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie werden unter der Creative Commons Lizenz "Namensnennung-Nicht kommerziell 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)" veröffentlicht.
Dritte dürfen die Beiträge:
-
Teilen: in jedwedem Format oder Medium vervielfältigen und weiterverbreiten
-
Bearbeiten: remixen, verändern und darauf aufbauen
unter folgenden Bedinungen:
-
Namensnennung: Dritte müssen angemessene Urheber- und Rechteangaben machen, einen Link zur Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden
-
Nicht kommerziell: Dritte dürfen das Material nicht für kommerzielle Zwecke nutzen
